SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ori) 428

D.P.MOHAPATRA
BISWANATH SAHU – Appellant
Versus
K. SOMANATH SUBUDHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
U.C. Panda, for the Appellant; B.B. Ratho, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

D.P. Mohapatra, J. - Defendant No. 3 in Title Suit No. 1 of 1986 pending in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Phulbani filed this application u/s 115 read with Section 151 of the CPC (for short 'the C.P.C.'), challenging the order dated 24-8-1988 of the trial Court rejecting his application under Order 1, Rule 10, Order 6, Rule 17, Order 8, Rule 6-A and Section 151 of the CPC to add the Collector; Phulbani and the Settlement Officer, Berhampur as Defendants in the suit and to amend the written statement converting it to a counter claim.

2. Opposite party No. 1 filed the aforementioned suit against opposite parties 2 and 3 with the prayers to declare his right title and possession over the suit land, to recover possession of the suit land from the Defendants after removing the cabins installed by them thereon.

The gist of the Plaintiff's case, as stated in the plaint, was that the Plaintiff and his family members had settled in Phulbani since more than 40 years j they reclaimed the suit land and other adjoining land belonging to the Government which was lying fallow and constructed houses thereon leaving the suit land for an orchard. In an amicable partition between the Pl











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top