SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ori) 965

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, I.MAHANTY
SRI. YASEEN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.

2. This writ application has been filed by Md. Yaseen Khan as the Respondents are not opening his commercial bid as technical bid submitted by him is found by them to be non-responsive. With, such grievance, this writ application was filed before this Court on 9.2.2007. On I 2.2007, a Division Bench of this Court granted ex-parte an interim order to the extent that if the work order was not issued till then, the same should not be issued. The said interim order is continuing till date.

3. In this matter, counter affidavit has been filed by the Opposite Parties 1 to 7. In the said affidavit filed by the Executive Engineer, Muran Dam Division, Upper Indrabati Hydro Electricity Project, various facts have been disclosed relating to the defects in the tender submitted by the Petitioner. Out of all the facts, such have been disclosed the most vital fact has been disclosed at Annexure-D the said affidavit. The said Annexure-D is a letter addressed to the Executive Engineer (O.P. 1) signed by the Petitioner himself on 12.1.2007 below:

I had tendered for the work against Sl. No. 1 & Sl. No. of the aforesaid Tender Call Notice. I had duly sub









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top