SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ori) 952

I.MAHANTY
BINOD BIHARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CUTTACK MADHU BAISYA BHADRAKI GUDIA SAMITI – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Indrajit Mahanty, J. - In the present writ application the Petitioner namely Binod Bihari Singh has sought to challenge an Order Dated 5.1.2007 passed by the Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), First Cuttack, Cuttack in C.S. No. 37 of 2005 rejecting his application for intervention under Order 1, Rule 10 C.P.C.

2. Civil Suit No. 37 of 2005 has been filed by Opp. Party No. 1- Cuttack Madhu Baisya Bhadraki Gudia Samiti, wherein prayer has been made for eviction of the Defendants (tenants) from the suit schedule property namely, Indumati Rath and Sanjaya Rath who were Defendants 1 & 2. It is further stated that Indumati Rath has in the meanwhile passed away leaving behind her adopted son, Sanjaya Rath (Defendant No. 2) as her only legal heir/successor.

3. The intervener-Petitioner claims that he is a close friend of Defendant No. 2 and was closely associated with Defendant No. 1 (since deceased). Since Defendant No. 2 was residing at Bhubaneswar and Defendant No. 1 was residing at Cuttack, the Petitioner who lives at Cuttack claims to have come forward and treated Defendant No. 1 as his mother and claims that Defendant No. 1 treated the Petitioner like her son, and therefor









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top