SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ori) 988

B.S.CHAUHAN, B.N.MAHAPATRA
N. V. KRISHNAN KUTTY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

B.S. Chauhan, C.J. - This Writ Petition has been filed against the Judgment and order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (hereinafter called the "Tribunal") dated 25.05.2005 in O.A. No. 633 of 2004, by which the Tribunal restrained the Opposite Parties to proceed with fresh inquiry but permitted to conclude the earlier inquiry from the point it stood vitiated for non-consideration of objections filed by the Petitioner against the inquiry report.

2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the Petitioner-employee was served with charge-sheet dated 25th September, 1998 (Annex. -1) that he was responsible for non- inspection and supervision of the maintenance of the Railway Track which ultimately led to derailment of the Goods Train on 4.6.1998. Petitioner-employee replied to the said charge-sheet and as the employer was not satisfied with the same, the Inquiry Officer was appointed. During the pendency of the said Inquiry the Petitioner-employee filed O.A. No. 180 of 1999 seeking various reliefs, namely, Inquiry Officer be changed; competent authority may also be changed; he should be furnished all material documents used in t
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top