SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.K.RATH
Sanjay Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
Munmum Patnaik – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Prafulla Ch. Biswal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Rath, J.

The core question that falls for determination in this petition is whether a woman, who is a domicile of the State of Orissa and became US citizen, is exempted from payment of court fee ?

2. Since the dispute lies in a very narrow compass, facts need not be recounted in details. Suffice it to say that plaintiff-opposite party no.1 instituted the suit for declaration of title, partition and permanent injunction. The suit is valued at Rs. 1,11,84,300/- on which, advolerum court fees of Rs. 3,61,931/- is payable. As the plaintiff is a woman, she is exempted from payment of court fees. After appearance, defendant no.1 filed an application stating therein that the plaintiff is a citizen of USA since 1991. She is an NRI. She is not exempted from payment of court fees. Learned trial court rejected the same on 4.12.2018. The instant petition seeks to laciniate the said order.

3. Heard Mr. Prafulla Ch. Biswal, learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. The Government of Orissa, in exercise of power conferred under section 35 of the Court Fees Act, 1987, issued SRO No.575 of 1994 remitted in the whole of the State of Orissa all fees mentioned in schedule I & II of the Act pay











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top