SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.K.RATH
Sudam Charan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Angul United Central – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Supriya Patra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

A.K.Rath, J.

This is a plaintiffs' appeal against confirming judgment in a suit for permanent injunction.

2. The case of the plaintiffs is that they came to Angul in the year 1944 and purchased Ac.0.12 dec. of land appertaining to Holding No.1/265. There was a dilapidated house on the Government land appertaining to sabik plot no.590/683, which corresponds to hal plot no.1267. Plaintiff no.1 repaired the building and occupied the same. Thereafter he constructed the house and used the same as godown and cattle shed to the knowledge of the Government. Plaintiff no.2, his son-in-law, is in possession of the house after plaintiff no.1. While matter stood thus, the Tahasildar initiated Encroachment Case No.86/88-89. The same is sub-judice. The defendants, a Cooperative Bank, had no semblance of right, title and interest over the suit land. But then the defendants created disturbance in their possession on 2.10.1988. With this factual scenario, they instituted the suit.

3. The defendants entered contest and filed written statement denying the assertions made in the plaint. According to them, the suit is hit under Section 127 of the Orissa Cooperative Societies Act and Sec.38 of Sp












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top