SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ori) 170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
S.K. SAHOO, J.
Srikanta Samal - Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 286 of 2012
Decided On : 01-11-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Smruti Ranjan Mohapatra, Adv., Priyabrata Tripathy, Adv.

The mandatory provisions under section 42(1) and (2) of the N.D.P.S. Act have been fully complied with, the seized articles were properly sealed and there was no chance of tampering with the seized ganja packets during its retention at Chauliaganj police station, and the articles produced before the Court were the very articles seized at the spot.

Headnote:

NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985 - SECTION 20(B)(II)(C) - POSSESSION OF CONTRABAND GANJA - SEARCH AND SEIZURE - COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 42(1) AND (2) - SAFE CUSTODY OF SEIZED ARTICLES - EVIDENCE OF OFFICIAL WITNESSES - RELIABILITY AND CREDIBILITY - DEFENCE PLEA - CONSIDERATION AND REJECTION - PUNISHMENT.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was found in illegal and unauthorized possession of two plastic bags containing in total 55 Kgs. of contraband ganja which was of commercial quantity. The prosecution case was that the appellant was transporting ganja in the offending vehicle and he was the occupant of the vehicle wherefrom contraband ganja was seized.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the prosecution has successfully established the charge under section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act against the appellant beyond all reasonable doubt. The Court held that the mandatory provisions under section 42(1) and (2) of the N.D.P.S. Act have been fully complied with, the seized articles were properly sealed and there was no chance of tampering with the seized ganja packets during its retention at Chauliaganj police station, and the articles produced before the Court were the very articles seized at the spot.

Issues: 1. Whether the mandatory provisions under section 42(1) and (2) of the N.D.P.S. Act have been complied with? 2. Whether the seized articles were properly sealed and there was no chance of tampering with the seized ganja packets during its retention at Chauliaganj police station? 3. Whether the articles produced before the Court were the very articles seized at the spot? 4. Whether the defence plea is tenable?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the mandatory provisions under section 42(1) and (2) of the N.D.P.S. Act have been fully complied with, as the informant had reduced the information into writing in the concerned register and forthwith sent a copy not only to his immediate official superior but also to other superior officers before proceeding to take action. 2. The Court held that the seized articles were properly sealed and there was no chance of tampering with the seized ganja packets during its retention at Chauliaganj police station, as the informant had taken the impression of his brass seal on a plain paper and kept one such paper inside each of the two bags containing ganja, stitched the mouth of the bags containing ganja and sealed the same with his brass seal impression, and the Inspector in charge of Chauliaganj police station had resealed the seized articles and kept it in the police station malkhana. 3. The Court held that the articles produced before the Court were the very articles seized at the spot, as the Court had verified the sealed seized exhibits along with the seal impression given by the investigating officer and found it to be correct and tallying with each other. 4. The Court held that the defence plea is not tenable, as it is inconsistent and taken at a belated stage, and there is no evidence to support the same.

Final Decision: The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned judgment and order of conviction and the sentence passed thereunder by the learned trial Court.

JUDGMENT :

S.K. Sahoo, J.

The appellant Srikanta Samal faced trial in the Court of learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Cuttack in G.R. Case No. 978 of 2010 (Tr. No.23 of 2010) for offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter 'N.D.P.S. Act') on the accusation that on 19.08.2010 at about 5.30 p.m. at Mahanadi Vihar, Cuttack, he was found in illegal and unauthorized possession of two plastic bags containing in total 55 Kgs. of contraband ganja which was of commercial quantity.

    The learned trial Court vide impugned judgment and order dated 11.04.2012 found the appellant guilty of the offence charged and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh), in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.

2. The prosecution case, as per the first information report lodged by Sri Rabinarayan Bhanja (P.W.11), S.I. of police, Mahanadi Vihar police outpost under Chauliaganj police station is that on 19.08.2010 at about 5.30 p.m. the informant received information from reliable sources that huge quantity of contraband ganja was kept inside a silver colour TATA SUMO vehicle which was parked by the side of the road in front of Plot No.1260, Shree Vihar, Mahanadi Vihar at a close distance to Reliance Fresh and that the appellant had brought the contraband ganja, kept the same in the TATA SUMO vehicle and intending to take it to Jagatsinghpur for sale and if immediate raid is not be conducted, the appellant would flee away. The informant had reason to believe that delay would facilitate the suspect to escape and so he decided to conduct raid and accordingly, he entered the fact in the outpost station diary vide Mahanadi Vihar O.P. S.D.E. no.352 dated 19.08.2010 and in the light of provision under section 42(2) of N.D.P.S. Act, he sent the letters along with the extract of the station diary entry to the IIC of Chauliaganj police station/A.C.P., Zone-I and D.C.P., Cuttack intimating them the grounds of belief through Havildar Sanantan Mallick vide Dispatch Register entry no.243. The informant along with other police staff proceeded to the spot to verify the authenticity of the information received and on the way, he picked up two independent witnesses explaining them the purpose of raid. At about 6.00 p.m., the raiding team arrived at the spot and found the Tata Sumo Vehicle bearing Regd. No. CG04-1788 was parked by the side of the road in front of Plot No.1260 and the appellant was sitting in the driver's seat and trying to start the vehicle. The informant and his staff surrounded the vehicle and directed the appellant to come out of the vehicle. The informant gave his identity to the appellant and also asked the appellant about his identity who disclosed the same. When the informant told the appellant that he had information that contraband ganja had been kept inside the TATA SUMO vehicle and that the appellant was dealing with contraband ganja, the appellant became nervous. Seeing the gesture and posture of the appellant, the informant's suspiciousness got confirmed and he disclosed his intention before the appellant to take his personal search as well as the search of TATA SUMO. When the informant intimated the appellant verbally as well as in writing to exercise his option as to whether he wanted to be searched before an Executive Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer, the appellant intimated the informant to be searched in the presence of any Gazetted Officer which was obtained in writing. The informant issued requisition to A.C.P., Zone-I, Cuttack with a request to remain present during search and accordingly, at about 7.00 p.m. Sri Nimai Charan Sethy (P.W.8), OPS, Asst. Commissioner of Police, Zone-I reached at the spot in his vehicle and the informant disclosed his information before the ACP and he was also introduced to the appellant. Before conducting the search, the informant, th

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top