SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ori) 207

A.K.RATH
Ganapati Patel (Since Dead) Through L. Rs. – Appellant
Versus
Urbasi Dei – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Gautam Mishra, Adv., Sagarika Sahoo, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. RATH, J.

1. Defendant no.1 is the appellant against a confirming judgment.

2. Plaintiffs-Respondents 1 to 4 instituted the suit for declaration of title in respect of Schedule-C land, recovery of possession, declaration that gift deed dated 26.11.1959 is null and void and Schedule-B land is the joint family property of the parties.

3. One Jagannath Patel died leaving behind five sons, namely, Ram Krishna, Ude, Ram Rai, Janardan and Shyamsundar. Ram Rai died leaving behind his wife-Padmabati and daughter Ghasiana-plaintiff no.4. Thereafter, Janardan, younger brother of Ram Krishna, married to Padmabati, according to the prevailing caste and custom of the society. Out of their wedlock, three daughters, namely, plaintiffs 1 to 3 were born. Ghasiana, daughter of Ramkrishna, was brought up in the house of Janardan. She was treated like daughter of Janardan. Case of the plaintiffs was that Janardan was separated from other two brothers in mess and property. He was in possession of Schedule-A land exclusively towards his share. In Mutation Case No.593 of 1950-51, his name was mutated in respect of Schedule-A land. He was in joint possession of Schedule-B land. Padmabati execut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top