SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ori) 275

A.K.RATH
Indira S Nair – Appellant
Versus
Chinmayee Pattnaik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajjet Roy, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Rath, J.

This petition challenges the order dated 23.07.2018 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhubaneswar in C.S. No.1737 of 2017 whereby learned trial court allowed the application filed by the defendant under Sec. 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('the Act') and referred the matter to the arbitrator.

2. The dispute lies in a very narrow compass. The facts need not be recounted in detail. Suffice it to say that the plaintiff-petitioner instituted a suit for eviction of the defendant. There was a house rent agreement between the parties. Defendant entered contest and filed a written statement. While the matter stood thus, defendant filed an application under Sec. 8 of the Act stating that there was a stipulation in the house rent agreement that in case dispute arises between the parties, the same shall be referred to the arbitrator. The plaintiff filed an objection. The Learned trial judge allowed the application.

3. Heard Mr. Rajjeet Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the opposite party in spite of valid service of notice.

4. The seminal question that hinges for consideration of this Court is whether the arbitrat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top