SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ori) 345

A.K.RATH
Khuswari Begum – Appellant
Versus
SK. Piru – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. H.S. Deo, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

A.K. RATH, J.

1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, challenge is made to the order dated 20.07.2018, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Baleswar, in C.S. No.610 of 2018-I whereby and whereunder, the learned trial Court allowed the application of the intervenors under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment.

2. Plaintiffs-petitioners instituted the suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. During pendency of the suit, a compromise was entered into between the plaintiffs and defendant- opposite party no.1. They filed an application to dispose of the suit in terms of compromise. While matter stood thus, the opposite party nos.2 to 5 filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment. It was stated that the defendant was the original owner of the suit land. They are in possession of the suit land on the basis of the oral gift dated 01.01.2005 made by the defendant. They have instituted C.S. No. 1416 of 2017 in the same court, which is subjudice. They have title over the suit property. Since the suit land has been gifted to them by the recorded owner and another suit is pending for trial, they are necessary parties to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top