SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ori) 893

S.K.SAHOO
Ehamat @ Sheikh Ahamat @ Fakir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.K. Sahoo, J. - Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The notice on opposite party no.2 is sufficient.

3. None appears on behalf of the opposite party no. 2.

4. The petitioner Ehamat @ Sheikh Ahamat @ Fakir has filed this application under section 482 of Cr.P.C., 1973 for quashing the criminal proceeding against him in C.T. Case No. 858 of 2012 arising out of Khantapada P.S. Case No. 111 of 2012 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Balasore.

5. It appears that on the first information report lodged by the opposite party no.2 Smt. Malati Das, Khantapada P.S. Case No. 111 of 2012 was registered under sections 363/366/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner.

6. This Court vide order dated 01.09.2014 taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has married to the victim girl and both of them are residing together as husband and wife and leading a happy conjugal life, asked the victim girl to appear before the Investigating Officer and also directed the Investigation Officer to take immediate steps for production of the victim girl before the concerned Magistrate for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top