SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Ori) 162

B.R.SARANGI, S.K.PANIGRAHI
Puspak Ranjan Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ganeswar Rath, N.R. Routray and S. Mishra, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Piyush Kumar Mishra and Satya Sundar Mishra, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

S.K. Panigrahi, J.

1. The petitioner, in this writ petition, questions the validity and propriety of the empanelled promotion list which has unjustifiably excluded him The petitioner is working as a Senior Section Engineer (Estimate), in the Office of the XEN/T & A/C, Bhubaneswar, under the Deputy Chief Engineer (Con), East Coast Railway, Bhubaneswar. He appeared in the selection test conducted for the formation of Group-B Panel (AENs) against 70% for departmental promotion quota vacancies. According to the petitioner, in 2004, in the same East Coast Railway, some of the candidates, juniors to him, were empanelled for promotion, but the petitioner was illegally excluded from the list even though he had no adverse remark.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that out of 61 candidates appeared in the written examination, 23 candidates qualified in the written test, including the petitioner, and were called for the viva-voce test on 01.10.2004. It is further submitted that the entire selection process was transparent and full proof. There was no s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top