SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.N.MISRA, P.K.MOHANTI
ORISSA CO-OPERATIVE INSURANCE COMPANY (NOW) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUBASHINI PRADHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.J. Ray, for the Appellant
R.C. Patnaik, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

R.N. Misra, J.—The insurer carried an appeal u/s 110D of the Motor Vehicles Act of 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') to this Court against the award of compensation passed by the 2nd Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and the said appeal was registered as Miscellaneous Appeal No. 128 of 1974. Before the Tribunal, the owner of the vehicle as also the insurer had contested the claim and after hearing parties, the Tribunal allowed compensation of Rs. 21,324/-. During the pendency of the appeal, a full Bench of this Court in the case National Insurance Co. Vs. Magikhaia Das (After him) Mst. Laxmi Dibya and Others, held that an insurer was not entitled to resist a claim on grounds not enumerated in Section 96(2) of the Act. The Appellant thereupon made an application for converting the Miscellaneous Appeal into a Civil Revision and on 15.6.1976, a learned Single Judge allowed the conversion. The appeal therefore, came to be registered as Civil Revision No. 162 of 1976. The insurer also made an application on 12.7.1976 for a writ of certiorari for quashing the same award and that application has been registered as O. J. C. No. 762 of 1976 and is pending disposal.

2. The m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top