SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 24

S.K.MISHRA, PRAMATH PATNAIK
Jitu Parida – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Nath & S.K. Rout,
For the Respondent: Mr. G.N. Rout, Additional Standing Counsel.

JUDGMENT :

S.K. MISHRA, J.

In this appeal, the sole appellant-Jitu Parida assails his conviction, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “the Penal Code” for brevity), and sentence to undergo imprisonment for life as well as to pay fine to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo R.I. for two years recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Angul in C.T.(s) No.141 of 2015.

02. The prosecution case in brief is that both the Appellant-Jitu Parida and the deceased Mamuli Barik belonged to village Kangula and there was previous enmity between them. The Appellant-Jitu Parida was once arrested by the Police, on the complaint of the deceased Mamuli Barik, and was subsequently released on bail. On 19.05.2015 at about 2.00 P.M. Jitu Parida on getting information that Mamuli had been to Angul Town and would return home, waited in the Tiffin shop of Sanjaya Parida located at Bihari Chhak, Kangula. At about 2.30 P.M. when Mamuli Barik reached the spot, the accused called the deceased to the Tiffin shop of Sanjaya Parida and there was altercation between them relating to previous dispute. Sanjaya Parida also reached the Tiffin shop and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top