SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 58

S.MURALIDHAR, B.P.ROUTRAY
Biswambar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sameer Kumar Das.
For the Respondent: Mr. M.S. Sahoo.

JUDGMENT :

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

1. The challenges in this writ petition are to three orders issued by this Court on the administrative side. The first is the order dated 27th March, 2017 issued by the Assistant Registrar (Administration) rejecting the application of four peons namely, Krushna Chandra Bahira (Petitioner No. 6), Gagan Bihari Sahoo (Petitioner No. 7), Mahendra Singh (Petitioner No. 11) and Basanta Kumar Pradhan (Petitioner No. 25) stating that the anomaly in their pay vis-a-vis their juniors caused by virtue of the exercise of option in fixation of pay and consequential grant of the Revised Assured Career Progression (RACP) scheme could not be rectified by stepping up of pay or antedating the increments in terms of the resolution dated 6th February, 2013 of the Finance Department, Government of Odisha.

2. The second decision challenged is one dated 23rd July, 2018 of the Under Secretary to Government, Home Department, Government of Odisha informing the Assistant Registrar (Administration) that in terms of Rule 13 (xi) of the Odisha Revised Scale of Pay Rules, 2017 (ORSP

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top