B.P.ROUTRAY, S.MURALIDHAR
Bhagaban Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Krushna @ Krushna Chandra Sahoo – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.P. ROUTRAY, J.
1. Both the appeals have been directed against the common judgment dated 12th November, 1999 of the learned Single Judge passed in F.A. Nos. 64 of 1996 and 183 of 1996.
2. The original Plaintiff is the deceased-appellant in both the present appeals. Defendant No. 6 was the appellant in F.A. No. 64 of 1996 and Defendant No. 2 was the appellant in F.A. No. 183 of 1996. For convenience, the parties here-in-after are referred with their original status in the suit.
3. The Plaintiff filed Original Suit No. 40 of 1987 under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for probate of the Will dated 10th April, 1960. The case of the Plaintiff is that, Harekrushna is the testator and he (Plaintiff) is the legatee in respect of the Will. Harekrushna has 1/4th share in ‘B’ schedule property of the suit. He was a leper and died as a bachelor on 6th March, 1962. Though Plaintiff is the natural brother of Harekrushna, but was adopted to the brother of their natural father. Similarly, Defendant No. 2, who was the grandson of Banchhanidhi, another brother of natural father of Harekrushna and Plaintiff, has been adopted by Alekha belonging to another branch of the common ancesto
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.