IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK
B.R. SARANGI, J.
Udayanath Rout - Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha & others - Opp. Parties
WPC (OAC) No. 2408 of 2015
Decided On : 09-08-2021
Constitution of India 1956 - Article 226 - Power of High Court to Issue Writ - Petitioner was initially engaged as Attendant under the Medical Officer, Community Bankoi, Khurda, pursuant to order under Annexure-1 for a period of 44 days purely on temporary basis, and the same was extended from time to time. Claiming regularization of his service, the petitioner filed. before the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack, which has been disposed of, along with batch of cases, - whether, in view of the conditional appointment made vide Annexure-2 putting a condition under clause-1 that pension will be guided as per provision of OCS Rules 1992 in pursuance to Finance Department Letter, the impugned order under Annexure-7, so far as petitioner is concerned, will sustain or not ? - whether a candidate is fit for a particular post or not has to be decided by the duly constituted Selection committee which has the expertise in the particular filed?.
Finding of the Court : It is pertinent to recapitulate that admittedly petitioner was appointed initially as an Attendant (Class-IV) on 44 days basis and his appointment was due to urgent need of the medical institution and under the need of the situation and, as such, his work and conduct as Class-IV is satisfactory - The decision of Selection Committee can be interfered only on limited grounds, such as illegality or patent material irregularity in constitution of committee or its procedure vitiating selection, or proved mala fides affecting the selection - There is no iota of doubt to come to a conclusion that petitioner is covered by conditional regularization order to extent that epension will be guided as per provision of OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 in pursuance to Finance Department Letter. As a result, the order under Annexure-6 issued by the Government of Odisha in Finance Department and consequential order under Annexure-7 issued by the Principal Accountant General (A&E), Odisha cannot sustain and are hereby quashed. The petitioner is entitled to be covered under the OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992, in pursuance of the Finance Department Letter - Court finds sufficient force in the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner.
Result : writ petition is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
B.R. Sarangi, J.
The petitioner, while working as Attendant (Class-IV) under the Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Bankoi, Khurda, has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the letter dated 29.11.2013 under Annexure-6 issued by Finance Department, Government of Odisha, clarifying the applicability of New Pension Scheme in case of contractual employees appointed prior to 01.01.2005 and brought over to regular establishment after that date; as well as order no.3331 dated 12.01.2015 under Annexure-7 issued by the office of opposite party no.3-Principal Accountant General (A&E), Odisha cancelling the GPF accounts numbers in respect of those employees working on contractual basis prior to 01.01.2005 and regularized after 01.01.2005 and directing to stop GPF deduction of such employees and forward the concerned FP application for settlement; and further to issue direction to the opposite parties to deduct the GPF from his salary as per OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 and G.P.F. (Orissa) Rules, 1938 and not to cancel the GPF account number allotted in his favour.
2. The factual matrix of the case, in brief, is that the petitioner was initially engaged as Attendant (Class-IV) under the Medical Officer, Community Health Centre (CHC), Bankoi, Khurda, pursuant to order dated 26.03.1999 under Annexure-1 for a period of 44 days purely on temporary basis, and the same was extended from time to time. Claiming regularization of his service, the petitioner filed O.A. No.1246(C) of 2001 before the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack, which has been disposed of, along with batch of cases, vide order dated 16.04.2012 with the following direction :-
2.1. In pursuance of such order of the tribunal, the CDMO, Khurda, vide letter dated 18.06.2012 sought clarification from opposite party no.1 as well as opposite party no.4. Consequentially, opposite party no.1 referred the matter to the Administrative Department as well as Law Department for examination and after obtaining the views, opposite party no.1, vide order dated 05.12.2012, directed the CDMO, Khurda to comply with the order dated 16.04.2012 passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1246(C) of 2001. On receipt of the said letter, the CDMO, constituted a selection committee, vide office order dated 10.12.2012. The selection committee considered the case of the petitioner and keeping in view the decision of the apex Court, the seniority of the petitioner as well as the period of service rendered by him, recommended his name for regularization of his service against regular Class IV post. Consequently, on the basis of the recommendation made by the selection committee, the CDMO, Khurda issued regular appointment order in favour of the petitioner on 12.12.2012. The relevant portion of the said appointment order reads as follows :
B.L. Sreedhar v. K.M. Munireddy
Union of India v. M/s. Anglo Afghan Agencies etc.
Chowgule & Company (Hind) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
M/s Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Union of India v. Godfrey Philips India Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.