SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 55

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
A.K. Mohapatra, J.
Nilufar Hamid - Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha & Ors. - Respondents
CRLMP No. 86 of 2022
Decided On : 31-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. K.K. Rout, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. P.C. Panda, Additional Standing Counsel, for the Respondent.

Mandatory registration of F.I.R. under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code when the information discloses a cognizable offence.

Headnote:

F.I.R. - Police Inaction - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154 - Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P., Paragraph 120.1 - State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal, Paragraph 31

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner approached the court due to the inaction of the police in registering an F.I.R. based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner. The petitioner had submitted a grievance petition before the Deputy Commission of Police, Cuttack, which was not acted upon.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Opposite Party No.2 to dispose of the grievance petition of the Petitioner within two weeks and consider the complaint in the light of the Supreme Court's rulings in Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P. and State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal.

Issues: Inaction of the police in registering an F.I.R. based on a complaint disclosing a cognizable offence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the mandatory nature of registering an F.I.R. under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, as per the rulings in Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P. and State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the case with the direction to the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the complaint and, if it reveals a cognizable offence, to direct the concerned Police Station to register the F.I.R. within two weeks.

ORDER

1. This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Being aggrieved by the inaction of the police to register F.I.R. on the complaint lodged by the Petitioner, the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present CRLMP application.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that he has submitted a grievance petition before the Deputy Commission of Police, Cuttack on dated 09.01.2022, which was sent by Registered Post and the receipt of which has been annexed to the CRLMP petition.

5. A bare reading of Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.') reveals, which is quoted herein below:-

    '154. Information in cognizable cases.(1) further information relating to the cognizable offence, if given orally to an Inspector-in-Charge of a Police Station, shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction, and be read over to the informant; and every such information where given in writing or reduced to writing as aforesaid, shall be signed by the person giving it, and the substance thereof shall be entered in a book to be kept by such officer in such form as the State Government may prescribe in this behalf.

    A close scrutiny of Section 154, Cr.P.C. makes it mandatory on the part of the Police Officer to register an F.I.R. in the event, a complaint is received by him which discloses commission of cognizable offence. The use of word 'shall' makes it mandatory for the Police Officer to register a complaint disclosing a cognizable offence. Therefore, the aforesaid provision in Cr.P.C. leaves no room for doubt whether a complaint disclosing cognizable offence is required to be registered as an F.I.R. or not. Therefore, the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station cannot simply sit over the complaint which discloses commission of cognizable offence.'

6. With regard to inaction on the part of the Officer-in-Charge of Police Station or any other Police Officer before whom a complaint is made either verbal or in writing and if such officer fails in his duty to register the same as an F.I.R. then the remedy has been provided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Paragraph-31 of the judgment rendered in the matter of State of Haryana vrs. Bhajanlal : reported in (1992) Supp(I) SCC 335. Paragraph-31 of the said judgment has been quoted herein below:-

    'At the stage of registration of a crime or a case on the basis of the information disclosing a cognizable offence in compliance with the mandate of Section 154(1) of the Code, the police officer concerned cannot embark upon an inquiry as to whether the information, laid by the informant is reliable and genuine or otherwise and refuse to register a case on the ground that the information is not reliable or credible. On the other hand, the officer in charge of a police station is statutorily obliged to register a case and then to proceed with the investigation if he has reason to suspect the commission of an offence which he is empowered under Section 156 of the Code to investigate, subject to the proviso to Section 156. (As we have proposed to make a detailed discussion about the power of a police officer in the filed of investigation of a cognizable offence within the ambit of Sections 156 and 157 of the Code in the ensuing part of this judgment, we do not propose to deal with those sections in extenso in the present context). In case, an officer in charge of a police station refuses to exercise the jurisdiction vested in him and to register a case on the information of cognizable offence reported and thereby violates the statutory duty cast upon him, the person aggrieved by such refusal can send the substance of the information in writing and by post to the Superintendent of Police concerned who if satisfied that the information forwarded to him discloses a cognizable offence, should either investigate the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by an police officer subord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top