SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 304

SAVITRI RATHO
Ramakrushna Panda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anirudha Das, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. K.K. Nayak, A.S.C., for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Anirudha Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.K. Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State through hybrid mode.

2. This is an application under Section 401 read with Section 397 of Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 14.09.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Case No.10 of 2021 arising out of T.R. No.49 of 2021 (Special G.R. Case No.126 of 2020) pending before the learned Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Puri rejecting the application of the petitioner filed under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure refusing to release the OPPO Reno 2F Mobile Phone bearing IMEI (1) No.860527040855059 and (2) 860527040855042 registered in his name which had been seized in Special G.R. Case No.126 of 2020 registered for commission of offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act. The prayer of the petitioner has been rejected on the primary ground that the phone was seized from the accused persons alongwith the contraband articles.

3. The prosecution in brief is that on 15.10.2020 at about 9.00 a.m. while the S.I. of Police of Town Police Station , along with his staff were conducting patrolling duty , they raided the house of the acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top