SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 308

S.K.SAHOO
State Of Odisha (Vigilance) – Appellant
Versus
Nalinikanta Behera – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sangram Das Standing Counsel (Vig.), for the Appellant; Mr. Trilochan Nanda B.K. Panda, for the Respondent.

ORDER

S.K. Sahoo, J. - Heard Mr. Sangram Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department and Mr. Trilochan Nanda, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. This leave petition under sub-sections (1) & (3) of section 378 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the State of Odisha (Vigilance) seeking for leave to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 09.01.2017 passed by the learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Bolangir in C.T.R. No.127 of 2007 in acquitting the respondents of the charges under section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(c)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (hereafter 'P.C. Act') and under sections 409/468/471/477-A/120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code from the charges of criminal breach of trust, forgery of muster rolls, falsification of Book of Accounts and misappropriation of Rs.2,51,168.80/- (rupees two lakhs fifty one thousand one hundred sixty eight and eighty paisa only) and thereby committing criminal misconduct being a public servant.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on receipt of reliable information about misappropriation of Government money by the forest officials in the plantations in the Dhama Forest Range of Sambalpur Forest D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top