SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 267

S.MURALIDHAR, A.K.MOHAPATRA
Utkalika Nayak – Appellant
Versus
District Judge, Khurda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. D.N. Rath, P.K. Rout& A.K. Saa, Advocates, for the Appellant;Mr. P.K. Muduli, Aga, for the Respondent.

ORDER

Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the District Judge, Khurda (Opposite Party No.1) and Registrar, Civil Courts, Khurda (Opposite Party No.2) to recast the Selection List and declare the Petitioner as the selected candidate for the post of Junior Typist, keeping in view her position in the combined merit list drawn pursuant to the advertisement dated 29th June, 2019.

2. The District Judge, Khurda published an advertisement dated 29th June, 2019 for filling up of different posts of Jr. Clerk-cum- Copyist, Stenographer (Grade-III) and Junior Typists. Pursuant thereto, the Petitioner applied for the post of Junior Typist. Seven vacancies were earmarked for the post of Junior Typist. Of these, 4 were for the unreserved (UR) category, 1 for Scheduled Caste (SC), 1 for Scheduled Tribe (ST) and 1 for the Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) categories.

3. The Petitioner states that she submitted an application mentioning her category as SEBC. In the combined merit list of candidates, the Petitioner's name was at Serial No.5. Thereafter a separate merit list for UR and reserved category candidates was prepared and published.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top