SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 283

D.DASH
Ananta Jena @ Ananta Prasad Jena – Appellant
Versus
Markanda Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Maheswar Mohanty, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

D. Dash, J. - The Appellant, by filing this Appeal, under Section-100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, 'the Code') has assailed the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Balasore in RFA No. 59 of 2014.

2. By the said judgment and decree, the First Appellate Court while allowing the First Appeal under section 96 of the Code filed by the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 (Plaintiffs) has set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Balasore in C.S. No. 192 of 2005-I. The suit for declaration of the right, title and interest of the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 (Plaintiffs) over the suit land and confirmation of their possession; in further injunction the Appellant (Defendant No.1) and Respondent No. 5 (Defendant No.2) from creating any sorts of disturbance in peaceful possession of the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 (Plaintiffs) over the suit land having been dismissed by the Trial Court, the same has been reversed by the First Appellate Court and finally, the suit has been decreed.

3. For the sake of convenience, in order to avoid confusion and bring in clarity, the parties hereinafter have been referred to, as they have been arra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top