IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
S.K. Mishra, B.P. Routray, JJ.
Pahali @ Pahala Behera - Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha - Respondent
CRLA No. 241 of 2015; CRLA No. 327 of 2015 and CRLA No. 103 of 2016
Decided On : 05-10-2021
Bail - Release on Bail Pending Appeal - Summary: The court granted bail to the appellants, who had been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment, considering their long detention inside custody and the remote possibility of hearing the appeals in the near future.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants had been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for an offence under Section 364-A/34 of the I.P.C. They had been in custody for more than ten years and eight months.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no established demand for ransom, no ransom was paid, and no hurt was received by the victim. The court also noted the lengthy detention of the appellants and the remote possibility of hearing the appeals in the near future.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellants should be released on bail pending appeal, considering their conviction and lengthy detention.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to release the appellants on bail based on the lack of established ransom payment, absence of hurt to the victim, the lengthy detention of the appellants, and the remote possibility of hearing the appeals in the near future.
Final Decision: The court directed to release the appellants on bail pending appeal on such terms and conditions as deemed fit by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar.
ORDER
M.C.No.147 of 2021 (arising out of CRLA No.241 of 2015) And M.C.No.838 of 2015 (arising out of CRLA No.327 of 2015) And I.A.No.868 of 2021 (arising out of CRLA No.103 of 2016)
1. All three appellants have prayed to release them on bail pending appeal under Section 389(1) of the Cr.P.C.
2. It is submitted by the respective counsels that, above three appeals along with other connected appeals are against the common judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in Crl.Trl No.02/20/111 of 2013/11. It is further submitted that all these three appellants are inside custody since 29th January, 2011, and the appellants, namely, Pahali @ Pahala Behera and Bapi @ Manoj Naik @ Mohan Sethi are permanent residents under Dasapalla Police Station in the district of Nayagarh whereas Rocky@Dillip Swain is a permanent resident under Patapur Police Station in the district of Ganjam. Learned counsel for the appellant-Rocky @Dillip Swain further submits that his I.A. No.868 of 2021 be confined to the prayer for bail only. All of them are poor persons and no chance of absconding is there in case they are released on bail.
3. The common submission made on behalf of the appellants that admittedly no ransom was paid and the fact of demand for ransom is not established on record. Neither the victim had received any hurt nor use of force has been proved on record. It is prayed that the appellants be released on bail keeping in view their long detention inside the custody.
4. All the accused persons including present three appellants have been convicted and sentenced for imprisonment of life along with payment of fine of Rs.6,000/- for offence under Section 364- A/34 of the I.P.C.
5. As it appears, they are inside custody for more than ten years and eight months by now.
6. The prosecution has examined twenty seven witnesses in course of trial and marked thirty one documents as exhibits.
7. Upon perusal of the evidences adduced through the witnesses and the circumstances brought on record, we are inclined to release the present appellants on bail particularly keeping in view their long detention inside custody and remote possibility of hearing of the appeals in near future. Accordingly, it is directed to release the appellants, namely, Pahali @ Pahala Behera, Bapi @ Manoj Naik @ Mohan Sethi and Rocky@Dillip Swain on bail in Crl.Tr.No.02/20/111 of 2013/11 pending appeal on such terms and conditions as deemed fit proper by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar.
8. All the applications are allowed. 9. Registry is directed to prepare the paper books and list the appeals for hearing.
10. Urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per Rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.