SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 121

K.R.MOHAPATRA
Lingaraj Tripathy – Appellant
Versus
Agadehi @ Taramani Tripathy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Digambara Mishra, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner in this CMP seeks to assail the order dated 11th February, 2019 (Annexure-3) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nayagarh in Execution Case No.2 of 2013 (arising out of T.S. No.67 of 1994), whereby he refused to recall the order dated 11th September, 2017 directing the Petitioner-Decree Holder (D.Hr.) to deposit the cost of deployment of Police force for execution of the decree.

3. It is submitted by Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner that vide order dated 11th September, 2017, learned executing court while entertaining an application under Order XXI Rule 35 C.P.C. filed by the Petitioner-DHr. directed that '.Further as there is an apprehension by the DHR that JDR shall cause breach peace at the time of delivery of possession of the suit land, the S.P. Nayagarh be informed to intimate this court the total one day cost of APR force who shall be deputed to be remained present at the spot on the date of delivery of possession of the suit land. After receiving information from S.P. Nayagarh regarding one day cost of APR force, the DHR shall be required to deposit the same to get police help

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top