SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 206

D.DASH
Kasturi Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
Ajaya Kumar Pani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. H. N. Mahapatra, Advocate, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This Appeal under Section-100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter called as the Code) has been filed in assailing the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Nimapara in RFA No.193/41 of 2016/2015.

By the same, learned First Appellate Court has confirmed the judgment and decree dated 18.4.2015 and 25.4.2015 respectively passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nimapara in Civil Suit No. 122 of 2013.

It is pertinent to state here that the husband of this present Appellant was the Defendant No. 1 before the Trial Court and having suffered from the judgment and decree passed therein; he had preferred the First Appeal. The said original Defendant No.1 having died after disposal of the First Appeal, his wife being the legal representative as the sole Appellant has presented the Second Appeal.

2. For the sake of convenience, in order to avoid confusion and bring in clarity, the parties hereinafter have been referred to as they have been arraigned in the trial court.

3. The Plaintiffs suit is for permanent injunction against the Defendant No. 1 in restraining him from making any construction over the suit land and block passage and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top