SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 166

S.K.SAHOO
Jaganath Mundari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mandakini Panda, Advocate, Sibani Sankar Pradhan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.K. Sahoo, J. - The appellant Jaganath Mundari faced trial in the Court of learned First Addl. Sessions Judge, Rourkela in Sessions Trial No.97 of 2011 for offences punishable under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code on the accusation that on 11.07.2010 at about 11.00 p.m., he along with others were found assembled near DAV Public School field, Rourkela by keeping a Bolero jeep for the purpose of committing dacoity and making preparation for the said purpose.

    The learned Trial Court vide impugned judgment and order dated 04.11.2016 found the appellant guilty of both the charges and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (rupees two thousand), in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months more for the offence under section 399 of the Indian Penal Code and rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand), in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months more for the offence under section 402 of the Indian Penal Code and both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case, in short, as per the first information report

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top