IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
Savitri Ratho, J.
Manoj Kumar Bhuyan And Other - Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa - Respondent
BLAPL No. 6438 of 2020; BLAPL No. 6706 of 2020; BLAPL No. 6520 of 2020 and BLAPL No. 6624 of 2020
Decided On : 15-07-2021
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Illicit Drug Trafficking - Section 21(c), 29 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need for chemical analysis reports to establish the presence and quantity of narcotics in seized substances. The court also highlighted the legal requirements for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and the relevance of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act in determining the nature of the seized substances.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the seizure of 3500 bottles of Eskuf cough syrup allegedly containing codeine from four petitioners, who were charged under Section 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution failed to produce the chemical analysis report or materials supporting the allegations, relying solely on the petitioners' confessions.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that a prima facie case under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act was not established due to the absence of the chemical examination report. It granted bail to the petitioners, emphasizing the need for satisfying the requirements of Section 37 of the NDPS Act before granting bail for offences involving commercial quantity.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the absence of the chemical analysis report, the reliance on confessions, and the legal requirements for bail under the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of the chemical analysis report to establish the presence and quantity of narcotics, the relevance of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act in determining the nature of seized substances, and the requirements of Section 37 of the NDPS Act for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantity.
Final Decision: The court granted bail to the petitioners, with conditions, due to the absence of a prima facie case under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act and the lack of the chemical analysis report. It allowed the State of Odisha to apply for recall/modification of the order based on the chemical examination report.
ORDER
1. These matters were heard through video conferencing mode.
Justice Indira Bannerji in her dissenting opinion in the case of Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in (2021) 4 SCC 1 has observed as follows:
".... 2. The illicit production, distribution, sale and consumption of drugs and psychotropic substances, is a crime of multi-dimensional magnitude, that imposes a staggering burden on the society. In an Article "Narcotic Aggression and Operation Counter Attack" published in the Mainstream dated March 7, 1992, V.R. Krishna Iyer, J. said:-
"Religion is opium of the people, but today opium is the religion of the people, and like God, is omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient. Alas! Opium makes you slowly ill and eventually kills, makes you a new criminal to rob and buy the stuff, tempts you to smuggle at risk to become rich quick, makes you invisible trafficker of psychotropic substances and operator of a parallel international illicit currency and sub rosa evangelist mafia culture. Drug business makes you if not killed betimes, the possessor of pleasure, power and empire. What noxious menace is this most inescapable evil that benumbs the soul of student, teacher, doctor, politician, artists and professional, and corrupts innocent millions of youth and promising intellectuals everywhere "
3. In the words of Krishna Iyer, J.,
"the global scenario in its sombre macabre, devouring delinquency, is dominated by drug abuse and narcotic trade. Trafficking in drugs and psychotropic substances is not any local or regional crime confined only to India and third- world countries, but is a worldwide phenomenon. All nations including India, had huge drug abuse as a threat to the survival of human beings. "
4. Illicit drug trafficking is an organised crime, highly sophisticated and complex. This illicit traffic, cleverly carried out by hardened criminals with dexterity and skill, not only violates national drug laws and international conventions, but also involves many other criminal activities, including racketeering, conspiracy, bribery and corruption of public officials, tax evasion, banking law violations, illegal money transfers, import/export violations, crimes of violence and terrorism.
5. Narcotics are often supplied for money and also in exchange for weapons. There are numerous drug trafficking mafia yielding, immense power in various regions of the world, including India. The far-reaching consequences of illicit drug trade, even threatens the integrity and stability of governments and renders law enforcement action vulnerable.
6. Considering the huge profits derived by drug barons from rampant consumption of opium and other narcotic drugs, tycoons of the drug cartels, who have international links, go to any extent, to exploit and manipulate unhealthy economic conditions, as well as corruption and weaknesses in the administration, to push drugs into the society, in complete disregard of the health, morality and well- being of the people.'"....
Here is a case, where a case under Section 21 (c) and 29 of the NDPS Act was registered against the four petitioners as 3500 bottles of Eskuf cough syrup allegedly containing codeine were recovered from them, which they allegedly confessed was being taken for drugging purpose. In view of the large quantity of the cough syrup seized, it was the duty of the prosecution to conclude the investigation without leaving any loose ends or lacuna. But although almost one year has elapsed since the case was registered and charge sheet is stated to be filed, neither the chemical analysis report nor any materials in support of the allegation that the petitioners were indulging in sale of the cough syrup for drugging purpose other than recording a confession of two lines that they are guilty, has been produced before this Court.
I have heard Mr. Aditya Kumar Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner- Manoj Kumar Bhuyan in BLAPL No. 6438 of 2020, Mr. Lalitendu Mishra, learned counsel for the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.