SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 426

D.DASH
Dev Dirda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hemant Kumar Rayatsingh, Advocate, P.C. Das, Advocate

JUDGMENT

D. Dash, J. - The Appellant, by filing this Appeal from inside the jail, has called in question the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 3rd May, 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Malkangiri in Criminal Trial No.24 of 2007. The Appellant as the sole accused having faced the Trial for commission of the offence under section 302 of the IPC, has been found guilty of the offence under section 304-II of the IPC and accordingly, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years with usual benefit of set off as provided under section 428 of the Cr.P.C.

2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 28th day of November, 2006 during morning hours, Nanga Madhi (the deceased) and the accused had been to Malkangiri to sell fire-wood and Anda Madhi who has been examined in P.W.1 in the trial, had accompanied them. In the afternoon, on their way back home from Malkangiri, there ensued a quarrel concerning cock fighting on the foot of hillock. The accused all of a sudden became got annoyed and assaulted the deceased by a lathi on his hand and head which resulted his fall on the ground. The accused then also assaulted the deceased o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top