SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 427

S.K.PANIGRAHI
Sanjukta Lenka – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Soma Patnaik, Advocate, M.S. Sahoo, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S. Muralidhar, C.J. - This appeal is directed against an order dated 9th October, 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) No. 3316 of 2015 filed by the Appellant.

2. There is a long history to the present litigation. This is the third round of litigation in this Court.

3. The background facts are that the Appellant was appointed as Anganwadi Worker in Arada-III Anganwadi centre on 1st June, 1986. By an order dated 28th May 2012, the Sub-Collector, Sadar, Cuttack (Respondent No.3) disengaged the Appellant. Aggrieved by the said order, the Appellant filed an appeal before the Collector, Cuttack (Respondent No.2), who dismissed the appeal by an order dated 16th January, 2013.

4. Aggrieved by the above order, the Appellant filed W.P. (C) No. 1963 of 2013 wherein, inter alia, she contended that the Respondent No.2 had blindly relied upon the report of the Supervisor, CDPO, SSWO, and Programme Officer while dismissing the Appellant?s appeal.

5. The said writ petition came to be disposed by the learned Single Judge by an order dated 21st February, 2013 after noting that the show cause notice (SCN) in respect to the action which was proposed to be taken against the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top