SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 460

S.K.PANIGARHI
Maxcare Laboratories Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner, Cgst – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jagabandhu Sahoo, Advocate, R.S. Chimanka, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S. Muralidhar, C. J. - The challenge in this writ petition by M/s. Maxcare Laboratories Ltd. (MLL) is to a show cause notice dated 29th March, 2000 (Annexure-1) issued by the Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Bhubaneswar-I (Opposite Party No.2) as well as a further notice dated 28th December, 2017 (Annexure-3) issued by the Superintendent (ADJN), CGST, Central Excise and Customs, Bhubaneswar (Opposite Party No.3) and a notice dated 9 th January, 2018 (Annexure-5) issued by the said officer.

2. The background facts are that the Petitioner is a company carrying on business of manufacturing of perfumed hair oil and red tooth powder having its plant at Mancheswar Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar. It is stated that the plant has been closed since long and the Petitioner has no business operation in the State of Odisha.

3. The first impugned show cause notice (SCN) was issued by the Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs (Opposite Party No.2) proposing a demand of excise duty in the sum of Rs.75,65,511/- invoking the extended period of limitation in terms of the proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ('CE Act') and Rules 9 (2) of the Central Excise Rules,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top