SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 432

K.R.MOHAPATRA
Prafulla Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M/s. Deepali Mahapatra & S. Parida, for the Appellant; Mr. S.N. Mishra; (Additional Government Advocate), for the Respondent.

ORDER

K.R. Mohapatra, J. - Petitioners being aggrieved by order dated 25.05.2017 (Annexure-8) passed by the Additional SubCollector, Jajpur (OP No.3) in Settlement Appeal [Suit No.101 of 2017 (84 of 2017)] have filed this Writ Petition in which, the claim of the Petitioners to record Hal Plot No.113 under Hal Khata No.182 to an extent of Ac.0.20 decimal situated in Mouza Umapada under Vyasanagar tahasil in the district of Jajpur (for short, 'the case land') in their name has been rejected.

2. Short narration of facts as reveal from the averments made in the writ petition are that, one Sri Jogi Mallick being a landless person was settled with Sabik Plot No.1/491 under Khata No.126 to an extent of Ac.1.00 decimal in mouza Umapada under Vyasanagar tahasil in the district of Jajpur in Lease Case No.58 of 1963-64. Said Jogi Mallick executed a gift deed in favour of his son-in-law, namely, Sri Hrusikesh Mallick on 23.01.1974 in respect of the lease hold property and delivered possession thereof to him. Due to legal necessity, said Hrusikesh Mallick after obtaining permission from the competent authority under Section 22 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 (for short, 'the OLR Act') aliena

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top