SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 500

SAVITRI RATHO
Gopal Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. B.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. G.N. Rout, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. I have heard Mr. Bigyan Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G.N Rout, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State through Video Conferencing mode.

2. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioner-Gopal Gupta in connection with Tangi P.S. Case No.12 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 168 of 2020 pending in the Court of the learned J.M.F.C.(R), Cuttack, registered for commission of offences under Sections 420/467/448 /471/34 of I.P.C and Section 103 and 104 of Trade Mark Act, 1999. Preliminary chargesheet dated 20.05.2020 has been submitted against the petitioner and his father Om Prakash Gupta for commission of offences punishable under Sec- 420/467/468/471/272/273/34 I.P.C keeping investigation open as verification reports from concerned Department is awaited and more clues are to be obtained.

3. This is the second journey of the petitioner to this Court. He had earlier filed BLAPL No.1664 of 2020 before this Court. In I.A.No 389 of 2020 arising out of the said application, he had been granted interim bail in vide order dated 26.05.2020 for a period of fifteen days and the same had been extended for anot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top