SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 344

BISWANATH RATH
Prakash Chandra Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K. Mishra, Advocate, S. Mishra, Advocate, H.M. Dhal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Biswanath Rath, J. - This writ petition involves the following prayer :-

    In view of the above and settled position of law, it is prayed, therefore that this Hon ble Court may graciously be pleased to ;

    i) Admit the writ petition and;

    ii) Issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the impugned order of rejection vide No.2317 dated 22.01.2021 at Annexure9 and order vide No.8553 dated 8.4.2016 at Annexure-6 so far as it relates to petitioner shall not be quashed and as to why the petitioner shall not be appointed in any post commensurate to his qualification under O.C.S.(R.A.), Rules, 1990 w.e.f. his due date;

    iii) And if the Opposite Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, the rule may be made absolute against Opposite Parties and a writ of mandamus may be issued to the Opposite Parties in quashing the impugned order of rejection vide No.2317 dated 22.01.2021 at Annexure9 and order vide No.8553 dated 08.04.2016 at Annexure-6 so far as it relates to petitioner with direction upon the O.Ps. to appoint the petitioner in any post commensurate to his qualification under O.C.S.(R.A.), Rules, 1990 w.e.f. the due date within a stipulated period

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top