SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 363

S.K.SAHOO
Laxminarayan Panigrahi – Appellant
Versus
Kishoremohan Mohapatra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajeet Roy (Amicus Curiae), for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

S. K. Sahoo, J. - The matter is taken up through Video Conferencing.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant Laxminarayan Panigrahi challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 03.02.1990 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Balasore in I.C.C. Case No.309 of 1988 in acquitting the respondents Kishoremohan Mohapatra, Manoj Kumar @ Manu Mohapatra and Saroj Kumar @ Ninu Mohapatra of the charges under sections 447, 427, 379, 323 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant preferred an application under section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. seeking for special leave to appeal from the order of acquittal which was granted in Criminal Misc. Case No.298 of 1990 as per order dated 27.08.1990 and accordingly, the present appeal was filed.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the appellant is the complainant in the said complaint petition and he presented the complaint petition on 31.10.1988 before the learned S.D.J.M., Balesore on the accusation that on 12.10.1988 at about 11.00 a.m., the respondents being armed with deadly weapons such as axe, lathi, katuri, sickle and sword entered into his land which appertains to Khata No.97, Plot No.529 at Mouza-Ghoadapada ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top