SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 407

B.P.ROUTRAY
Tapan Jal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The petitioners, namely, Tapan Jal and Ghanashyama Mahanand in BLAPL No.9418 and the petitioners, namely, Raju Jal, Kal Mugri and Gajman@Gajaban Shika in BLAPL No.10222 of 2019 have prayed for their release on bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. and the offences alleged are under Sections 147/148/341/ 325/302/436/114/120B/149 of the IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. Both the bail applications being arose out of the same Tititalgarh P.S.Case No.37 dated 3.3.2011, have been heard analogously and are disposed of by a common order.

2. The facts of the case are to the effect that, the accused persons numbering 53 in total as per the chargsheet were the employees of M/s.Graphite India Limited-Powmex Steels Division situated at Turula under Titilagarh Police Station. There was a dispute between the management and the workers for which the workers were staging their protest on the occurrence day i.e., 3.3.2011. On that fateful day when the deceased, who was the D.G.M. of the factory, was going for lunch along with the Vice-President of the factory, namely, Bichitrananda Panda, just outside the main gate of the factory the angry workers torched their vehicle a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top