SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 242

BISWANATH RATH
Dushashan Bag – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing.

1. Heard Mr. S.P. Swain, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. R. Mishra, learned AGA for O.Ps.

2. Short question involved herein is as to when the Rule 15(5) of the Orissa Civil Services (C.C.A) Rules, 1962 hereinafter in short be called as 'the Rules, 1962' permits a Government servant to take assistance of a legal practitioner to present his case before the inquiring authority and when the Disciplinary Authority has already permitted the delinquent to take assistance of a legal practitioner, whether the inquiring officer is justified in rejecting the claim of the petitioner in the matter of engagement of legal practitioner on behalf of him?

3. Taking this Court to the plea taken in the communication vide Annexure-7 Mr. Swain, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that since the Department is examining Officers higher in position than the petitioner appearing as department witnesses, petitioner being a Constable is feeling insecure to crossexamine and/or putting questions to the witnesses(s) and it is, only on this context, the delinquent prayed for taking assistance of legal practitioner.

4. Mr. Mishra, learned AGA, how

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top