SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 367

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
B.P. Routray, J.
Devi Prasad Tripathy - Appellant
Versus
The Principal Commissioner Cgst And Central Excise Bhubaneswar & Ors. - Respondents
W. P. (C) No. 27727 of 2020
Decided On : 31-03-2021

Practicing advocates are exempt from service tax/GST, and the burden of proof lies with them to establish their exemption status. The GST Commissionerate should refrain from issuing notices demanding tax payments to practicing advocates.

Headnote:

GST - Legal Services - Exemption for Practicing Advocates

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, received notices from the GST Commissionerate demanding payment of service tax/GST despite being exempted from it. The petitioner had to prove that he was a practicing advocate and not liable to pay the tax.

Finding of the Court:

The Court expressed concern over the harassment faced by practicing advocates due to the issuance of notices demanding tax payments, despite being exempted. The Court directed the Commissioner GST to issue clear instructions to all officers to refrain from issuing such notices to practicing advocates.

Issues: Harassment of practicing advocates by GST Commissionerate, Exemption of practicing advocates from service tax/GST, Burden of proof on practicing advocates

Ratio Decidendi: The burden of proof lies with the petitioner to establish their status as a practicing advocate exempt from service tax/GST. The Court emphasized the need for clear instructions to prevent harassment of practicing advocates by the GST Commissionerate.

Final Decision: The Commissioner GST was directed to issue clear instructions to all officers in the GST Commissionerates to refrain from issuing notices demanding payment of service tax/GST to practicing advocates. The case was listed for further proceedings on a later date.

ORDER

1. The Counter affidavit sworn to by the Principal Commissioner, GST and Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Commissionerate on behalf of Opposite Party Nos.1 to 7 is produced in Court today, which is taken on record.

2. It is stated in the said affidavit that 'after receiving information from Devi Prasad Tripathy having PAN as being an individual advocate practicing in the Hon'ble High Court of Odisha', further proceedings against him are dropped.

3. What the Court is concerned about is the deponent insisting that the Petitioner should have submitted 'documentary evidence to prove his claim that he is a practicing individual lawyer and does not come under the provision of GST or service tax.'

4. A reference is made to a Notification dated 20th June 2012, in terms of which service tax liability of an individual advocate is Nil for legal services rendered to any of business entities located in the taxable territory. However, even for this, the Department appears to insist that the burden to prove it lies on the Petitioner. The counter affidavit filed acknowledges that a similar notice was issued to the Petitioner in 2017 to which he replied, pointing out how he was not liable to pay any service tax.

5. Mr. P. K. Parhi, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, has fairly admitted that no notice in the first instance ought to have been issued to the Petitioner, who is a practising advocate. However, when specifically asked whether the clear instructions have been issued by the Department to all the officers involved in the enforcement of the GST regime that practising advocates should not be issued notices, he sought time for instructions.

6. During the hearing, certain other advocates present in the Court stated that they too have received such notices. It appears that despite knowing fully well that advocates are not liable to pay service tax or GST, notices continue to be issued to them by the GST Commissionerate.

7. The Court expresses its concern that practising advocates should not have to face harassment on account of the Department issuing notices calling upon them to pay service tax/GST when they are exempted from doing so, and in the process also having to prove they are practising advocates. The Commissioner GST is directed to issue clear instructions to all the officers in the GST Commissionerates in Odisha that no notice demanding payment of service tax/GST will be issued to lawyers rendering legal services and falling in the negative list, as far as GST regime is concerned. Copies of such instructions be placed before the Court on the next date.

8. List on 22nd April, 2021.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top