SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 121

V.NARASINGH
Bandita Rout – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.K. Ojha, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. M. Mishra, Mr. G. Mishra, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

V. Narasingh, J.

1. The lis relates to selection of Anganwadi Worker of Chhandamunda Anganwadi Centre. The petitioner and the Opposite Party No.5 were applicants to be engaged as Anganwadi workers of the Centre in question. The selection committee after due scrutiny found the petitioner to be eligible and accordingly she was engaged as such.

2. During her incumbency as Anganwadi Worker Chhandamunda Anganwadi Centre, assailing her appointment the Opposite Party No.5 preferred an appeal before the statutory Appellate Authority that is A.D.M. Jajpur by filing A.W.W. Misc. (Appeal) No.05 of 2018. The appellate Authority by order dated 13.02.2019 after giving all concerned opportunity of hearing set aside the selection of the petitioner and directed the Administrative Authority that is C.D.P.O. Binjharpur to take appropriate steps to “engage the appropriate candidate observing all formalities”. Consequent upon the same the petitioner was disengaged and the Opposite Party No.5 was engaged as such.

Assailing such order of the Appellate Authority dated 13.02.2019 at Annexure-7 the present Writ Petition has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Ojha submits that the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top