SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 124

SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Ramanath Ho – Appellant
Versus
Krushna Chandra Jarika – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.R.Barik
For the Respondent: Mr.P.K.Maharaj Addl. Standing Counsel

JUDGMENT :

Sashikanta Mishra, J.

The present revision is directed against the judgment passed by learned Ad hoc Addl. Sessions Judge (FTC), Baripada in Criminal Appeal No.9/66 of 2011/2009 in confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by learned S.D.J.M., Karanjia in I.C.C. No.44/2006 (T.C. No.619/2007). As per judgment passed on 14th December, 2009, the trial court had convicted six persons including the present five Revision Petitioners for the offences under Sections 379/447/506 of I.P.C. and passed sentence against each as follows:-

Petitioner No.1 (Ramanath Ho) was sentenced to undergo R.I. for three months for the offence under Section 379 of I.P.C., R.I. for one month for the offence under Section 447 of I.P.C. and R.I. for four months for the offence under Section 506 (1) of I.P.C. Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 namely, Aswini Ho and Ladhula Ho were sentenced to undergo R.I. each for one year for offence under Section 379 of I.P.C., R.I. for two months for offence under Section 447 of I.P.C. and R.I. for 8 months for the offence punishable under Section 506(1) of I.P.C. Petitioner No.4-Kuni Ho was sentenced to undergo R.I. for three months for the offence under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top