SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 243

B.P.ROUTRAY
Bidyut Prava Agasti – Appellant
Versus
Batakrushna Dash – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B. Singh.
For the Respondents: R. Pati, A. Rath.

JUDGMENT :

B.P. ROUTRAY, J.

1. The claimant has come up in appeal against the judgment dated 10th September, 2015 of learned MACT-I, Baleswar in M.A.C. Case No. 159 of 2012.

2. The grievance of the claimant-Appellant is that she sustained injury in the motor vehicular accident dated 14.03.2012 while coming in a motorcycle as a pillion rider. The offending tractor bearing Registration No. OR-01-U-4993 coming in a rash and negligent manner with a high speed dashed against the motorcycle and as a result of the accident she sustained multiple fracture injuries. She was under treatment in the West End Hospital, C.D.A. Cuttack from 15.03.2012 to 09.04.2012. Her further case is that due to the accident she suffered permanent disability up-to 60%. But the learned Tribunal has failed to grant appropriate compensation on that count.

3. As seen from the impugned judgment, the learned Tribunal has granted compensation to the tune of Rs. 5,30,000/- for the injuries sustained by the claimant in the accident. The learned Tribunal has computed the compensation as follows:

(i)

For pain and suf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top