SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 246

SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Anirudha Majhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: J. Sahoo, B.R. Sahoo.
For the Respondent: P.K. Maharaj.

JUDGMENT :

SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.

1. The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 08.12.2011 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Nabarangpur in Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 2003, whereby the judgment of conviction and sentence passed on 13.08.2003 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum-JMFC, Nabarangpur in G.R. Case No. 495 of 1984 was confirmed. By the said judgment learned trial Court had convicted the petitioner for the offence under section 408 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo S.I. for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- in default, to undergo further S.I. for 6 months.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

    In course of investigation in connection with Kodinga P.S. Case No. 55 of 1984 under Section 408 of IPC, it came to light that the present petitioner Anirudha Majhi while working a Salesman in Kotagaon Sales Centre under Kodinga LAMPCS from 07.01.1981 to 30.10.1981, received goods of different kinds from the Head Office and other Sales Centers and also received the closing balance of Sanagumuda Sales Centre, in all amounting to Rs. 33254.81. However, he deposited the sale proceeds at the Head Office and diverted some goods to different Sales

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top