SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 264

B.P.ROUTRAY
Sabita Jena – Appellant
Versus
Lelin Jena – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Satyabhusan Das.
For the Respondent: Subrat Satpathy.

JUDGMENT :

B.P. ROUTRAY, J.

1. Learned 1st MACT, Cuttack in the impugned judgment dated 25th February, 2016 has directed for payment of compensation to the tune of Rs. 34,41,408/- to the claimant on account of serious injuries sustained in the motor vehicular accident dated 26th January, 2012.

2. The amount of compensation has been calculated as follows:

Loss of future income

Rs. 33,21,408/-

Attendant Cost

Rs. 15,000/-

Medical Expenditure

Rs. 50,000/-

Mental agony, pain and Suffering and loss of amenities

Rs. 50,000/-

Cost of litigation

Rs. 5,000/-

Total

Rs. 34,41,408/-

3. The injured - claimant represented through his wife has come up in appeal praying for enhancement. Dissatisfied with the compensation amount, it is submitted on behalf of the claimant that the learned Tribunal did not grant any amount towards future prospects and further, the amount granted towards loss of amenities of life is inadequate. It is also contended that no future medical expenses and attendant cost has been granted by the learned Tribunal.

4. Conversely, it is sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top