SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 377

SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Kaminilata Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sidheswar Mallik.
For the Opposite Parties :Mr. N.K. Praharaj, Government Advocate, Mr. M.K. Dash.

JUDGMENT :

Sashikanta Mishra, J.

The Petitioner was appointed as a Lecturer in Sanskrit on 12th September, 2009 on contractual basis in Biren Mitra Memorial Women’s College, Cuttack. The said College is an aided educational institution. While continuing as such, an advertisement was published on 24th August, 2013 inviting candidates for selection and appointment to the post of Lecturer in Sanskrit. The Petitioner, though continuing in the post applied pursuant to the said advertisement. An interview was conducted in which the Petitioner stood first. She was issued a fresh appointment order on 24th December, 2013 as Lecturer in Sanskrit on consolidated pay of Rs.2000/-per month, which was subsequently enhanced to Rs.5,300/-. On 4th May, 2017, the Principal of the College (Opposite Party No.4) issued an office order disengaging the Petitioner and some other Lecturers from their services w.e.f. 1st May, 2017. Neither any prior notice was issued nor any explanation was called for from the Petitioner. No reason was also ascribed for taking such action. Being aggrieved thus, the Petitioner has approached this Court claiming the following relief:-

    “Quash the impugned order dated 4.5.2017 dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top