IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K. PANIGRAHI, J.
Headmistress, Jageswaree Uchha Bidyalaya, Aloi – Petitioner
Versus
State of Orissa and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) Nos. 37097, 37101, 37102, 37105, 37860 of 2021
Decided On : 11-08-2022
Recognition - Educational Institution - Odisha Education Act, 1969 - Section 6-B (4) - Chapter-IX of the Board of Secondary Education, Odisha Regulation
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the withdrawal of recognition from their institution by the Deputy Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Odisha, without notice or opportunity to be heard. The petitioner argued that the withdrawal was illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Odisha Education Act, 1969 and the Board's Regulation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's institution did not meet the criteria mandated by Chapter-IX of the Board's Regulation for recognition, leading to the withdrawal of recognition. The court directed the Board to afford the petitioner's schools a fresh opportunity to comply with the recognition parameters and remove the defects.
Issues: Withdrawal of recognition without notice or opportunity to be heard, compliance with recognition parameters, and protection of students' interests.
Ratio Decidendi: The withdrawal of recognition was found to be based on non-compliance with recognition parameters. The court directed the Board to provide a fresh opportunity for compliance before taking further action.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the Writ Petitions, directing the Board to afford the petitioner's schools a fresh opportunity to comply with the recognition parameters. No costs were awarded.
JUDGMENT :
S.K. PANIGRAHI, J.
1. Since similar questions of law or facts are involved in all the Writ Petitions listed above, all the matters were heard together. However, this Court felt it apposite to decide W.P. (C) No. 37102 of 2021 first and whatever the outcome of the said Writ Petition, the same will be covered to other similar connected Writ Petitions mentioned above.
(I) Facts of the case:
2. The petitioner, in the present Writ Petition, has challenged the legality of the Letter No. 292 (R&G) dated 06.11.2021 under Annexure-5 issued by the Opposite Party No. 5-Deputy Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Odisha, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar withdrawing recognition from the petitioner's institution from the session 2020-2021 sans issuance of any notice or giving any opportunity to the institution. Such withdrawal of recognition has been done on the basis of recommendation received by the Opposite Party No. 5/Deputy Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Odisha, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar from the Opposite Party No. 3/District Education Officer, Khurda. Even the said recommendation letter received from the Opposite Party No. 3/District Education Officer, Khurda has not been served on the petitioner’s institution. On the contrary, the Opposite Party No. 3-District Education Officer, Khurda vide Letter No. 13316 dated 08.11.2021 under Annexure-6 requested the Opposite Party No. 5-Deputy Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Odisha, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar to allow the students of the schools mentioned therein to appear the Annual H.S.C. Examination-2022 as quasi-regular candidates through the nearby located Government High School. Further, the Opposite Party No. 3/District Education Officer, Khurda vide order dated 13601 dated 17.11.2021 under Annexure-7 requested the Opposite Party No. 5/Deputy Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Odisha, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar to change the enrolment of Class-IX students of the schools mentioned therein to appear the Annual H.S.C. Examinatjion-2023 as quasi-regular candidates through the nearby Government High School. All these letters of the Opposite Party Nos. 3 and 5 are contrary to the Section-6-B (4) of the Odisha Education Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act” for brevity) and also against the provisions contained in Chapter-IX of the Board of Secondary Education, Odisha Regulation. Hence, the petitioner prays for quashing of the letter dated 06.11.2021/Annexure-5 issued by the Opposite Party No. 5/Deputy Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Odisha, Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar and letters dated 08.11.2021 and 17.11.2021 issued under Annexure-6 and 7 respectively by the Opposite Party No. 3/District Education Officer, Khurda.
(II) Submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner:
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Jageswaree Uchha Bidyalaya, Aloi, in the district of Khurda was established in the year 1992 and got permission from the State Government from the academic session 1996-97 to open Class-VIII as required under the statute. Recognition of the said school was granted by the Director, Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar vide order dated 14.01.1999 from the session 1996-97.
4. He further submitted that as per the law, once the institution is opened with the permission and recognition by the Prescribed Authority, the institution has to apply for grant of recognition for both classes i.e. Classes-IX and X through the prescribed format to the Board of Secondary Education, Odisha. Accordingly, the Opposite Party No. 4/Board of Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar granted recognition to the institution for Classes-IX and X vide letter dated 29.12.2001. It is further submitted that Regulation 16 of Chapter-IX of the Board Regulation prescribes certain criteria to be filled up by the institution seeking recognition from the Board such as Classroom, Headmaster’s room, Teachers’ common room, Library room, Science equipment and Trained Teachi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.