SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 404

G. SATAPATHY
Bijaya Manjari Satpathy – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. M. Agarwal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S.S. Pradhan, Aga, Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

G. Satapathy, J. - The petitioner in this CRLMC seeks the indulgence of the Court U/S.482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the complaint in 1.C.C. Case No.60 of 2014 of the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Angul in an application U/S.482 of Cr.P.C. for not arraigning the trust as an accused in terms of Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short the N.I. Act).

2. Facts in precise are opposite party No.2-Kanheilal Choudhury instituted the complaint in 1.C.C. Case No.60 of 2014 against the petitioner as General Secretary, M/s. Bijay Laxmi Trust and opposite party No.3- Dinabandhu Mishra in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Angul for commission of offences U/S.138 of N.I. Act on account of dishonour of cheque bearing No.083955 dated 31.12.2013 issued by opposite party No.3 as President of M/s. Bijay Laxmi Trust for an amount of Rs.7,30,550/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Thirty Thousand and Five Hundred Fifty) as the cheque on presentation returned back to opposite party No.2 as unpaid with endorsement from Bank of Baroda, Angul Branch on 18.02.2014 'account closed'. Opposite party No.2 acco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top