SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 205

B. P. ROUTRAY
Basi Bewa – Appellant
Versus
Raimani Majhiani – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.D.P.Mohanty, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr.S.D.Das, Senior Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

B.P.Routray, J.

Heard Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for the Appellants and Mr. Das, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent.

2. The Appellants are the defendants. The original plaintiffs were two wives of Langa Majhi. Present Respondent being the daughter of Langa Majhi was substituted upon death of both the plaintiffs. Suit Scheduled-'B' lands were originally belonging to Langa Majhi. Plaintiff's case is that, the father of original defendant and after him the defendants are in forcible possession of suit Schedule-B lands and they accordingly prayed for declaration of their right, title, interest and possession over the suit Scheduled-'B' lands along with mesne profit.

3. The case of the defendants is that the suit land was purchased by Madhu Majhi, the father of original defendant on 8th February 1947 on payment of consideration amount of Rs.3,500/-. The concerned 'Chukti-Patra' (conditional sale deed) has been produced under Ext.A.

4. Learned Trial Court dismissed the suit against the plaintiff confirming the sale under Ext.A in favour of the father of original defendant by Langa Majhi. Plaintiff carried the same in appeal before the District Judge, Baripada in Title Appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top