D. DASH
Akshaya Kumar Majhi – Appellant
Versus
Satyanarayan Rajkua – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D. Dash, J.
The Appellant, by filing this Appeal under Section-100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'the Code'), has assailed the judgment and decree dated 26.12.2022 and 05.01.2023 respectively passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kuchinda in R.F.A. No.07 of 2017.
The Respondent No.1 as the Plaintiff had filed the suit for declaration of his possessory title over the suit land and issuance of permanent injunction against the present Appellant (Defendant No.3) from entering into the suit land, constructing any house over there as also interfering in the peaceful possession of the Plaintiff over the same.
The suit having been decreed, this Appellant (Defendant No.3) having suffered from the same have carried the Appeal under section-96 of the Code, which has also been dismissed. Hence, the present Second Appeal.
2. For the sake of convenience, in order to avoid confusion and bring in clarity, the parties hereinafter have been referred to, as they have been arraigned in the Trial Court.
3. Plaintiff's Case: -
One Katsu Ranbida died had leaving behind two daughters namely, Ganga and Jamuna. Ganga and her husband died issueless.
Subasini is the sister of Ja
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.