JUDGMENT

A.C. Behera, J.

 This Second Appeal has been preferred against the reversing judgment.

2. The respondent of this Second Appeal was the sole plaintiff before the Trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No.13 of 1992 and she was the appellant before the First Appellate Court in the First Appeal vide T.A. No.37 of 1999.

The appellants of this Second Appeal were the defendants before the Trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No.13 of 1992 and they were the respondents before the First Appellate Court in the First Appeal vide T.A. No.37 of 1999.

3. The suit of the plaintiff before the Trial Court vide T.S. No.13 of 1992 was a suit for declaration and recovery of possession.

4. The case of the plaintiff (who is the respondent in this Second Appeal) before the Trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No.13 of 1992 was that, she (plaintiff) purchased total 23 x 74 cubits land from her two vendors i.e. Juddhistira Sahu and Dibakar Subudhi on dated 21.12.1972 through two registered sale deeds. As the plaintiff was staying with her husband in the service place of her husband, for which, she (plaintiff) engaged her uncle, namely, Bidhan Nayak to look after her purchased properties including the suit site, t