Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D. DASH, V. NARASINGH
Anandini Rana – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the accused's conviction (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. evaluation of circumstantial evidence principles (Para 6 , 9) |
| 3. arguments for and against conviction (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. testimonies and medical evidence (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's analysis of guilt (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. final ruling and order (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
The Appellant from jail assailing her conviction under Section 364 /302/201 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (‘IPC’) and sentencing her for life and pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- in default to undergo R.I for two years for the offence under Section 302 IPC, R.I for five years and pay a fine of Rs.5000/- in default to undergo R.I for one year under Section 364 IPC and R.I for two years and pay a fine of Rs.2000/- in default to undergo R.I for six months under Section 201 IPC with the stipulation that the substantive sentences would run concurrently in terms of the judgment and order of sentence dated 28.02.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kalahandi, Bhawanipatna in C.T. (Sessions Case) No.24 of 2012, has filed this Appeal.
Prosecution Case
4. The case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence and to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
