SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 271

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Harihara Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Urmila Sahoo – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Debasis Sarangi, Advocate.
For the Opp. Party : Mr. L.N. Patel, Adv.

Table of Content
1. overview of proceedings and initial orders. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding the maintenance orders and appeals. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's decision on the pending appeal and execution relief. (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT :

The Petitioner has preferred this revision questioning the correctness of order dated 21st October, 2019 passed by learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Berhampur in Crl. Appeal No.16/2019 whereby the order passed by learned J.M.F.C., Berhampur on 20th April, 2019 in M.C. No.146/2017 was confirmed. The original case before the learned Magistrate being Misc. Case No.149 of 2014 was filed by the present Opposite Party (wife) under Section 12 of the PWDV Act claiming maintenance and other incidental reliefs. The said case was disposed of by learned Magistrate by order dated 27th February, 2017 directing the Petitioner(husband) to pay Rs.3,500/- towards monthly maintenance along with other reliefs including Rs.2,500/- as monthly house rent and Rs.4,000/- towards compensation. The said order was challenged by the husband in Crl. Appeal No.24/2017 which is pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Berhampur. In the meantime, in an execution case being filed by the wife

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top